Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)

Development application 21 220130 WET 05 CD

Ward 5 · Frances NunziataDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Under Review; In progress
Submitted: 30 September 2021; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Addresses: 6 Lloyd Ave
Ward: Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
Submitted: 30 September 2021
Status: Under Review
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 555 units
Related file: 21 176811 WET 05 SA

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

*** Draft Plan of Standard Condominium application for a 4 to 17 storey mixed-use building (residential/commercial) which contains 555 residential units (43,736 m2) and ground floor retail space (1,131 m2) proposed, with three levels of underground garage. The proposal also includes residential bicycle parking (500 long term spaces and 56 short term spaces), 287 residential parking spaces, and 3 loading spaces (2 Type C and 1 Type G) on the Site.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Carlyle Communities Inc.
SM36834 · 31 July 2025 · “6 Lloyd Avenue”
Carlyle Communities Inc.
SM25067 · 22 September 2017 · “6 Lloyd Avenue.”
Rockport Homes Limited
SM24933 · 1 August 2017 · “6 Lloyd Ave”
2053785 Ontario Inc.
SM19872 · 21 November 2013 · “6 Lloyd Avenue.”
Stanton Renaissance
SM21740 · 18 March 2013 · “6 Lloyd Avenue.”
2053785 Ontario Inc.
SM18744 · 4 December 2012 · “6 Lloyd Ave”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 5

2 lobbied · 3 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 5: 2 lobbied and 3 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	3	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.