Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Development application 21 220069 WET 05 SB
1956 Weston Rd; 1966 Weston Rd; 1974 Weston Rd; 1978 Weston Rd; 1980 Weston Rd; 1986 Weston Rd
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 30 September 2021
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
- Addresses
- 1956 Weston Rd; 1966 Weston Rd; 1974 Weston Rd; 1978 Weston Rd; 1980 Weston Rd; 1986 Weston Rd
- Ward
- Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
- Submitted
- 30 September 2021
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 592 units
- Related file
- 19 219985 WET 05 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
To permit a mixed-use development including two tall buildings with heights of 29-storeys (approximately 99 m in height, measured to the top of the mechanical penthouse) connected by a 12-storey podium (approximately 41 m in height, measured to the top of the 12th floor). Overall, the site would include 592 residential units and 3,991 square metres of non-residential space. A total of 174 vehicle parking spaces and 463 bicycle parking spaces would be provided in a two level underground parking garage with the exception of 7 vehicle parking spaces which would be provided at-grade.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 5
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.