Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 21 216473 STE 12 SA

Ward 12 · Josh MatlowDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: NOAC Issued; Approved
Submitted: 22 September 2021; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 1467 Bathurst St
Ward: Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted: 22 September 2021
Status: NOAC Issued
Outcome recorded: Approved
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 1,338 units; 89,302 m² gross floor area
Related file: 17 278700 STE 21 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Application proposing a 40-storey, 35-storey and 37-storey mixed-use building with a total non-residential gross floor area of 1827 square metres, and residential gross floor area of 89,301.9 square metres, with a total of 1,338 residential dwelling units, of which, 26 will be affordable rental dwelling units. Note metric heights of towers are as approved as per Site Specific By-law 648-2020.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Canderel Management Inc.
SM31677 · 11 May 2021 · “1467 Bathurst Street”
Kingsett Capital
SM27183 · 17 December 2018 · “1467 Bathurst Street”
Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP
SM26183 · 23 May 2018 · “1467 Bathurst Street”
1467 Bathurst Street Holdings Inc.
SM26224 · 15 May 2018 · “1467 Bathurst Street.”
Pattison Outdoor Advertising
SM10391 · 28 February 2008 · “1467 Bathurst St”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12

32 lobbied · 72 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied511

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=4
Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12: 32 lobbied and 72 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	32	—	100% (n=4)	0%	3%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	72	511	100% (n=7)	0%	0%	0.05

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.