Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 21 212462 STE 12 OZ
- Status
- Council Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 14 September 2021
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 40 Raglan Ave
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 14 September 2021
- Status
- Council Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 352 units; 21,600 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
June 2022 Submission: Zoning By-law Amendment to facilitate the redevelopment of a 97.5-metre (29-storey excluding Mech. Penthouse) mixed-use building having a residential gross floor area of 21,600 square metres. A total of 274 residential dwelling units are proposed, of which, 62 will be rental replacement units. April 2022 Revised Submission: a 29-storey (103.9 metres to the top of the mechanical penthouse) apartment building, including a 245 square metre Community Space fronting Raglan Avenue and a proposed public park along the south side of the Subject Site. The proposal has a total gross floor area of 21.600 square metres, a slight increase from 21,148 square metres in the initial proposal. A total of 274 residnetial untis are proposed, which is a slight decrease from the 279 residential units in the initial proposed. An 174 sqaure metres public park is proposed on the south lot line, which is a slight increase from the 168 square metre public park in the initial proposal. The revised development proposal continues the streetscape and public realm improvements along Raglan Avenue as well as a slight decrease (1,103 sqaure metres from 1,124 sqaure metres) of indoor and outdoor amenity space.In 2024 and 2025, the Committee of Adjustment approved variances to the Zoning By-law under Minor Variance Decision A0686/24TEY and A0277/25TEY. Current proposal is for a 36-storey mixed-use building (including a mechanical penthouse), with a total of 352 residential dwelling units (of which 62 units will be rental replacement units).
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | 1,925 | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | 1,799 | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.