Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 21 198274 ESC 20 SA
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- In progress
- Submitted
- 13 August 2021
- Appealed
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 320 McCowan Rd
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 13 August 2021
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
- Size stated in the description
- 483 units
- Related file
- 20 118393 ESC 20 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan Approval for two new residential towers having heights of 25 and 29-storeys, atop a 5-storey podium consisting of 483 residential units.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Blauson Assets Management LtdSM29587 · 9 January 2020 · “320 McCowan Road”
- BLAUSON ASSET MANAGEMENTSM29581 · 8 January 2020 · “320 McCowan Road”
- BLAUSON ASSET MANAGEMENTSM29582 · 8 January 2020 · “320 McCowan Road.”
- BLAUSON ASSET MANAGEMENTSM29584 · 8 January 2020 · “320 McCowan Road.”
- BLAUSON ASSET MANAGEMENTSM29163 · 14 November 2019 · “320 McCowan Road”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 20
11 lobbied · 34 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 34 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.