Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 21 192052 ESC 24 OZ
3718 Kingston Rd; 3730 Kingston Rd
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- In progress
- Submitted
- 30 July 2021
- Appealed
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 3718 Kingston Rd; 3730 Kingston Rd
- Ward
- Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie
- Submitted
- 30 July 2021
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
- Size stated in the description
- 419 units; 30,278 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
REVISED PROPOSAL: Revised Zoning By-Law Amendment Application and site plan application (23 139161 ESC 24 SA) is to permit the development of a 24-storey building with a 7-storey podium that steps down to the adjacent properties to the north and east. The total GFA proposed is 30,902 square metres consisting of 30,230 square metres of residential GFA and 671 square metres of commercial GFA resulting in an FSI of 5.24 times the site area. The building contains 419 residential units including a mix of townhomes, studios, 1-,2-, & 3-bedrooms that have been designed to allow for the incorporation of 20% barrier-free accessible units. The non-residential space is located at-grade along Kingston Road and Scarborough Golf Club Road. (Previous Submission, September 16, 2025): Revised Zoning By-Law Amendment Application and site plan application (23 139161 ESC 24 SA) is to permit the development of a 24-storey building with a 7-storey podium that steps down to the adjacent properties to the north and east. The total GFA proposed is 30,951 square metres consisting of 30,278 square metres of residential GFA and 673 square metres of commercial GFA resulting in an FSI of 5.25 times the site area. The building contains 419 residential units including a mix of townhomes, studios, 1-,2-, & 3-bedrooms that have been designed to allow for the incorporation of 20% barrier-free accessible units. The non-residential space is located at-grade along Kingston Road and Scarborough Golf Club Road.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 24
8 lobbied · 7 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.