Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 21 166615 STE 13 SA
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 7 June 2021
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 25 St Mary St
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Submitted
- 7 June 2021
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 21 166606 STE 13 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan Approval for two mixed-use towers having heights of 54 and 59-storeys.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Tenblock Management LPSM36415 · 4 March 2025 · “25 St. Mary Street”
- Tenblock DevelopmentsSM35533 · 23 April 2024 · “25 St Mary St”
- 25 St. Mary Developments Inc.SM35508 · 16 April 2024 · “25 St. Mary Street”
- 25 St. Mary Developments Inc.SM34322 · 16 March 2023 · “25 St. Mary Street”
- 25 St. Mary Developments Inc.SM31706 · 18 May 2021 · “25 St. Mary Street”
- Claude Cormier + Associés inc.SM31718 · 18 May 2021 · “25 St. Mary Street”
- 25 St. Mary Developments Inc.SM31719 · 18 May 2021 · “25 St. Mary Street”
- 25 St. Mary Developments Inc.SM31651 · 17 May 2021 · “25 St. Mary Street”
- 25 St. Mary Developments Inc.SM31586 · 21 April 2021 · “25 St. Mary Street”
- TenblockSM30765 · 29 October 2020 · “25 St. Mary Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.