Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 21 166606 STE 13 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 7 June 2021
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 25 St Mary St
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Submitted
- 7 June 2021
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application for two mixed-use towers having heights of 54 and 59 storeys.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Tenblock Management LPSM36415 · 4 March 2025 · “25 St. Mary Street”
- Tenblock DevelopmentsSM35533 · 23 April 2024 · “25 St Mary St”
- 25 St. Mary Developments Inc.SM35508 · 16 April 2024 · “25 St. Mary Street”
- 25 St. Mary Developments Inc.SM34322 · 16 March 2023 · “25 St. Mary Street”
- 25 St. Mary Developments Inc.SM31706 · 18 May 2021 · “25 St. Mary Street”
- Claude Cormier + Associés inc.SM31718 · 18 May 2021 · “25 St. Mary Street”
- 25 St. Mary Developments Inc.SM31719 · 18 May 2021 · “25 St. Mary Street”
- 25 St. Mary Developments Inc.SM31651 · 17 May 2021 · “25 St. Mary Street”
- 25 St. Mary Developments Inc.SM31586 · 21 April 2021 · “25 St. Mary Street”
- TenblockSM30765 · 29 October 2020 · “25 St. Mary Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
83 lobbied · 97 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 83 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 11% | 0.14 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 97 | 1,793 | 93% (n=14) | 7% | 17% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.