lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 21 143747 STE 10 OZ

19 Queens Quay E; 25 Queens Quay E; 31 Queens Quay E; 37 Queens Quay E

Ward 10 · Ausma MalikDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
OMB Appeal
In progress
Submitted
21 April 2021
Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
19 Queens Quay E; 25 Queens Quay E; 31 Queens Quay E; 37 Queens Quay E
Ward
Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted
21 April 2021
Status
OMB Appeal
Outcome recorded
In progress
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
Yes
Size stated in the description
449 units
Related file
10 147097 STE 28 SA

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Proposal to modify previously approved Buildings A and F. Building A is proposed with a revised height of 11 storeys containing 136 residential dwelling units (previously approved for 13 storeys containing 132 units). Building F is proposed with a revised height of 45 storeys containing 449 residential dwelling units (previously approved for 13 storeys containing 139 units). In total, an additional 314 residential units are proposed. Please note that OPA/Rezoning File No. 21 143747 STE 10 OZ is being reviewed at the same time as Site Plan Control File No. 21 143750 STE 10 SA. OPA/Rezoning must be approved prior to site plan approval.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=7
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied10%
  • Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied88—100% (n=7)0%10%0.03
Matched, unlobbied94—100% (n=7)0%5%0.01
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.