Development application · Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
Development application 21 115735 STE 12 PL
101 St Clair Ave W; 111 St Clair Ave W; 129 St Clair Ave W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 12 February 2021
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
- Addresses
- 101 St Clair Ave W; 111 St Clair Ave W; 129 St Clair Ave W
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 12 February 2021
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 10 321208 STE 22 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Part Lot Control Exemption for 1 lot.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Churchterrace Developments Inc.SM31349 · 8 March 2021 · “129 St. Clair Avenue West.”
- 101 St. Clair Building Group Inc.SM27140 · 10 December 2018 · “101 St. Clair Avenue West.”
- Camrost-FelcorpSM24893 · 27 July 2017 · “111 St. Clair Avenue West”
- Camrost-FelcorpSM24895 · 27 July 2017 · “111 St. Clair Avenue West.”
- DiamondcorpSM17744 · 27 January 2012 · “129 St Clair Ave W”
- Whitecastle New Urban FundSM17447 · 11 November 2011 · “129 St. Clair Avenue West.”
- Diamond CorpSM17399 · 3 November 2011 · “129 St. Clair Avenue West.”
- Whitecastle New Urban FundSM17401 · 3 November 2011 · “129 St. Clair Avenue West”
- The Camrost CorporationSM17334 · 17 October 2011 · “111 St. Clair Avenue West”
- Diamond CorpSM16602 · 20 June 2011 · “129 St. Clair Avenue West”
- The Camrost CorporationSM12515 · 19 November 2008 · “111 St. Clair Avenue West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.