Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 20 230438 STE 12 OZ
8 Brownlow Ave; 190 Soudan Ave; 192 Soudan Ave; 194 Soudan Ave; 196 Soudan Ave; 198 Soudan Ave; 200 Soudan Ave
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 18 December 2020
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 8 Brownlow Ave; 190 Soudan Ave; 192 Soudan Ave; 194 Soudan Ave; 196 Soudan Ave; 198 Soudan Ave; 200 Soudan Ave
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 18 December 2020
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 185 units; 12,493 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposal for 21-storey residential building with 167 new rental units, in addition to maintaining the 185 rental units in the existing apartment building. Approximately 12493 square metres of new residential GFA is proposed, resulting in an overall FSI of 4.5 times the area of the lot. The existing 19-storey residential rental building located on the northerly portion of the subject site, municipally known as 18 Brownlow Avenue, will be retained.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Malen Capital DevelopmentsSM31193 · 26 January 2021 · “8 Brownlow Avenue.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | 1,925 | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | 1,799 | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.