lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 20 211279 ESC 20 OZ

411 Kennedy Rd; 415 Kennedy Rd; 636 Danforth Rd; 636-646 Danforth Rd; 638 Danforth Rd; 640 Danforth Rd; 642 Danforth Rd; 644 Danforth Rd; 646 Danforth Rd

Ward 20 · Parthi KandavelDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
OMB Approved
Approved
Submitted
27 October 2020
Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
411 Kennedy Rd; 415 Kennedy Rd; 636 Danforth Rd; 636-646 Danforth Rd; 638 Danforth Rd; 640 Danforth Rd; 642 Danforth Rd; 644 Danforth Rd; 646 Danforth Rd
Ward
Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
Submitted
27 October 2020
Status
OMB Approved
Outcome recorded
Approved
Decision date
7 October 2026
Appealed
Yes
Related file
20 211336 ESC 20 SB

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Redevelopment for one 23-storey mixed use building at 636-646 Danforth Road (Block A1) and a 19-storey mixed use building at 411-415 Kennedy Road (Block A2) both with retail/commercial on the ground floor, residential above and below grade parking.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20

13 lobbied · 19 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20: 13 lobbied and 19 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied13Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied19Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.