Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 20 200319 STE 13 CD
6 A Alexander St; 6 Alexander St; 501 Yonge St; 503 Yonge St; 505 A Yonge St; 505 Yonge St; 507 Yonge St; 509 Yonge St; 511 A Yonge St; 511 Yonge St; 513 A Yonge St; 513 B Yonge St; 513 Yonge St; 515 Yonge St; 517 Yonge St; 519 Yonge St; 521 Yonge St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 29 September 2020
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 6 A Alexander St; 6 Alexander St; 501 Yonge St; 503 Yonge St; 505 A Yonge St; 505 Yonge St; 507 Yonge St; 509 Yonge St; 511 A Yonge St; 511 Yonge St; 513 A Yonge St; 513 B Yonge St; 513 Yonge St; 515 Yonge St; 517 Yonge St; 519 Yonge St; 521 Yonge St
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Submitted
- 29 September 2020
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 832 units
- Related file
- 11 187996 STE 27 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposal for 832 residential units in the approved mixed-use building, comprised of 25 and 52 storey towers connected by a seven-storey podium and parkade.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Lanterra DevelopmentsSM22125 · 13 August 2015 · “501 Yonge Street”
- Lanterra DevelopmentsSM21476 · 24 February 2015 · “501 Yonge Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13
4 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.