Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)

Development application 20 198767 STE 13 CD

46 Power St; 48 Power St; 50 Power St; 52 Power St; 54 Power St; 113 Parliament St; 115 Parliament St; 121 Parliament St; 123 Parliament St; 125 Parliament St; 129 Parliament St; 135 Parliament St

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 25 September 2020; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Addresses: 46 Power St; 48 Power St; 50 Power St; 52 Power St; 54 Power St; 113 Parliament St; 115 Parliament St; 121 Parliament St; 123 Parliament St; 125 Parliament St; 129 Parliament St; 135 Parliament St
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 25 September 2020
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 505 units
Related file: 13 181685 STE 28 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Draft Plan of Standard Condominium for 505 residential dwelling units (and 2 guest suite units) within the approved 19 and 22-storey building consisting of a 5-storey podium and 2 towers.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Great Gulf Group of Companies
SM23378 · 21 July 2016 · “48 Power Street”
Great Gulf Group of Companies
SM18904 · 1 February 2013 · “48 Power Street”
Great Gulf Homes
SM18576 · 19 October 2012 · “48 Power Street”
Great Gulf Ltd.
SM18552 · 17 October 2012 · “48 Power Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13

4 lobbied · 23 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13: 4 lobbied and 23 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	23	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.