Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 20 196539 ESC 24 OZ
448 Markham Rd; 450 Markham Rd; 452 Markham Rd; 454 Markham Rd
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 21 September 2020
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 448 Markham Rd; 450 Markham Rd; 452 Markham Rd; 454 Markham Rd
- Ward
- Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie
- Submitted
- 21 September 2020
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 48 units; 8,485 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Revised December 2021 Submission to address City staff comments.Proposal for 45 residential units located in 4 blocks. Block 1 would be occupied by a stacked townhouse building containing 22 residential units. Block 2 would be occupied by a grade-related townhouse building containing 5 residential units. Blocks 3 and 4 would each be occupied by grade-related townhouse buildings containing 9 residential units, respectively. The applicant has advised that the project would function as a standard condominium corporation. Original SubmissionThe application proposes to demolish the existing dwellings on the subject property and replace them with 48 townhouse units. The application proposes 8,485 square metres of residential gross floor area and a Floor Space Index of 1.14 times the site area. 50 vehicular parking spaces and an outdoor amenity area are also proposed. A 6-metre wide private driveway is proposed with two access points on Markham Road. This zoning amendment application is associated with Site Plan Application No. 20 196545 ESC 24 SA.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 24
8 lobbied · 7 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.