Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Development application 20 185816 STE 09 SB
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- In progress
- Submitted
- 26 August 2020
- Appealed
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
- Addresses
- 900 Dufferin St
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Submitted
- 26 August 2020
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
- Related file
- 19 184841 STE 09 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Draft Plan of Subdivision to facilitate the redevelopment of the north parking lots of Dufferin Mall comprising of 4 blocks including a new private road and a block dedicated for future parkland.This application is intended to supplement the combined application for Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-Law Amendment File No. 19 184841 STE 09 OZ.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- PrimarisSM33384 · 20 June 2022 · “900 Dufferin Street”
- Dufferin Mall Holdings Inc.SM31185 · 25 January 2021 · “900 Dufferin Street”
- Dufferin Mall Holdings Inc.SM27959 · 3 April 2019 · “900 Dufferin Street.”
- Dufferin Mall Holdings Inc.SM27048 · 20 November 2018 · “900 Dufferin Street”
- Dufferin Mall Holdings Inc.SM26971 · 9 November 2018 · “900 Dufferin Street.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 9
1 lobbied · 3 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.