Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 20 146806 WET 03 SA
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 20 May 2020
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 3199 Lake Shore Blvd W
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Submitted
- 20 May 2020
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 20 146801 WET 03 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
INACTIVE Site Plan Control application to permit the proposed Humber Cultural Hub which is a phased institutional development as part of the Humber College Lakeshore Campus. The proposal includes the partial redevelopment of the existing building with the construction of multiple building additions that would be developed in two phases. The first phase would include the construction of an 8 student residence building that would be connected by 1 to 4-storey academic podiums. The second phase would include a new 3-storey academic podium, with a music and performing arts hall, which would connect to the first phase. The existing 6-storey student residence fronting Lake Shore Boulevard West would remain, as well as the existing 2 and 3-storey library building which would connect to the proposed development. The existing 2-storey academic building component located in the center of the site would be demolished and a portion of the existing surface parking lot would be removed to facilitate the proposal.The total gross floor area of the institutional development would be 49,611 m², of which 30,380 m² would be attributed to the proposed development and 19,231 m² would be attributed to the existing buildings that would be retained on the site.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3
24 lobbied · 100 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 24 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 4% | 0.25 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 100 | 1,629 | 70% (n=10) | 30% | 4% | 0.14 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.