lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 20 144709 STE 11 SA

2 Cumberland St; 4 A Cumberland St; 4 Cumberland St; 6 A Cumberland St; 6 B Cumberland St; 6 C Cumberland St; 8 Cumberland St; 826 Yonge St; 830 Yonge St; 832 Yonge St; 834 Yonge St

Ward 11 · Dianne SaxeDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
12 May 2020
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
2 Cumberland St; 4 A Cumberland St; 4 Cumberland St; 6 A Cumberland St; 6 B Cumberland St; 6 C Cumberland St; 8 Cumberland St; 826 Yonge St; 830 Yonge St; 832 Yonge St; 834 Yonge St
Ward
Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Submitted
12 May 2020
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Related file
15 114759 STE 27 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Amendment application for a 51-storey mixed-use building (162.5 metres plus a 7.5 metre mechanical penthouse) approved under application 16-270346 STE 27 SA. Approved Minor Variance: revisions to lower levels and an increase in dwelling units.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11

46 lobbied · 113 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=3
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied9%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11: 46 lobbied and 113 matched unlobbied applications in 26 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied46—100% (n=3)0%9%0.09
Matched, unlobbied113—100% (n=11)0%2%0.02
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.