Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 20 120382 STE 13 OZ

109 George St; 111 George St; 115 George St; 117 George St; 119 George St; 121 George St; 125 George St; 231 Richmond St E

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 28 February 2020; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 109 George St; 111 George St; 115 George St; 117 George St; 119 George St; 121 George St; 125 George St; 231 Richmond St E
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 28 February 2020
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 516 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment application to facilitate the development a 39-storey Mixed-use building, which will incorporate the façade of 125 George Street and the retention of the existing 3-storey office building at 109 George Street. The proposed development includes a 254 m2 POPS space along George Street, retail uses at grade, office uses on the 2nd through 4th floors, and a residential tower above, with 516 dwelling units.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Diamond Corp
SM28030 · 15 April 2019 · “125 George St”
Diamond Corp
SM28030 · 15 April 2019 · “231 Richmond St. E.”
Alterra Developments 2000 Limited
SM27490 · 30 January 2019 · “125 George Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13

82 lobbied · 96 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=13
Matched, unlobbied90% n=14

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied10%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied16%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13: 82 lobbied and 96 matched unlobbied applications in 34 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	82	—	100% (n=13)	0%	11%	0.15
Matched, unlobbied	96	—	90% (n=14)	10%	16%	0.08

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.