Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 20 105467 STE 13 SA
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 16 January 2020
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 60 Mill St
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Submitted
- 16 January 2020
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 26,944 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 19 264586 STE 13 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan Approvalt to permit a 31-storey hotel tower with a total building height of 115.1 m (inclusive of mechanical penthouse). A total of 392 hotel suites are proposed with a total GFA of approximately 26,944 square metres. The existing heritage Rack House D building is proposed to be incorporated as part of the proposal.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Gupta Group of HotelsSM30378 · 24 July 2020 · “60 Mill Street”
- Gupta Group of HotelsSM30374 · 23 July 2020 · “60 Mill Street”
- 1293446 Ontario Inc.SM30293 · 9 July 2020 · “60 Mill Street”
- Gupta Group of HotelsSM30158 · 3 June 2020 · “60 Mill Street”
- Gupta Group of HotelsSM30159 · 3 June 2020 · “60 Mill Street”
- Gupta Group of HotelsSM29454 · 19 December 2019 · “60 Mill Street”
- Easton's GroupSM28203 · 16 May 2019 · “60 Mill Street”
- Cityscape Development CorporationSM21303 · 23 January 2015 · “60 Mill Street”
- Cityscape Development CorporationSM21308 · 23 January 2015 · “60 Mill Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.