Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 19 263095 STE 12 SA

1637 Bathurst St; 1639 Bathurst St; 1641 Bathurst St; 1643 Bathurst St; 1645 Bathurst St

Ward 12 · Josh MatlowDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: NOAC Issued; Approved
Submitted: 19 December 2019; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 1637 Bathurst St; 1639 Bathurst St; 1641 Bathurst St; 1643 Bathurst St; 1645 Bathurst St
Ward: Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted: 19 December 2019
Status: NOAC Issued
Outcome recorded: Approved
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 75 units; 8,490 m² gross floor area
Related file: 18 115438 STE 21 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

A Site Plan Control application to permit a 4 storey rental apartment building containing 75 units. The five existing 3-storey buildings on the site are proposed to be demolished and the existing 25 rental units will be replaced in the new development. The total proposed residential gross floor area is 8490square metres, with a floor space index of 2.04 times the area of the lot. A total of 93 parking spaces and 76 bicycle parking spaces are proposed in the application. Please see File No. 18 115438 STE 21 OZ for the associated Zoning By-law Amendment application.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Starlight Investments
SM37831 · 30 July 2026 · “1637 Bathurst Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12

32 lobbied · 72 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied511

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=4
Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12: 32 lobbied and 72 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	32	—	100% (n=4)	0%	3%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	72	511	100% (n=7)	0%	0%	0.05

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.