Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 19 239452 WET 05 OZ

6 Lloyd Ave; 161 Mulock Ave; 163 Mulock Ave; 165 Mulock Ave; 167 Mulock Ave; 169 Mulock Ave; 171 Mulock Ave; 177 Mulock Ave; 179 Mulock Ave; 181 Mulock Ave

Ward 5 · Frances NunziataDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: OMB Appeal; In progress
Submitted: 22 October 2019; Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 6 Lloyd Ave; 161 Mulock Ave; 163 Mulock Ave; 165 Mulock Ave; 167 Mulock Ave; 169 Mulock Ave; 171 Mulock Ave; 177 Mulock Ave; 179 Mulock Ave; 181 Mulock Ave
Ward: Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
Submitted: 22 October 2019
Status: OMB Appeal
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: Yes
Related file: 13 278533 WET 11 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

The Please be advised this application has been appealed to the OLT. The applicant is submitting a new proposal to the OLT instead of what was previously Council endorsed.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Carlyle Communities Inc.
SM36834 · 31 July 2025 · “6 Lloyd Avenue”
Carlyle Communities Inc.
SM25067 · 22 September 2017 · “6 Lloyd Avenue.”
Rockport Homes Limited
SM24933 · 1 August 2017 · “6 Lloyd Ave”
2053785 Ontario Inc.
SM19872 · 21 November 2013 · “6 Lloyd Avenue.”
Stanton Renaissance
SM21740 · 18 March 2013 · “6 Lloyd Avenue.”
2053785 Ontario Inc.
SM18744 · 4 December 2012 · “6 Lloyd Ave”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5

12 lobbied · 17 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5: 12 lobbied and 17 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	12	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	17	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.