Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)

Development application 19 191837 STE 13 CD

5 Wellesley St W; 7 Wellesley St W; 11 Wellesley St W; 14 Breadalbane St; 16 Breadalbane St; 20 Breadalbane St; 25 Wellesley St W; 26 Breadalbane Street

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 19 July 2019; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Addresses: 5 Wellesley St W; 7 Wellesley St W; 11 Wellesley St W; 14 Breadalbane St; 16 Breadalbane St; 20 Breadalbane St; 25 Wellesley St W; 26 Breadalbane Street
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 19 July 2019
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 740 units
Related file: 13 138607 STE 27 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Draft Plan of Condominium for a recently constructed mixed use building (740 residential units). A total of 620 parking spaces are provided below grade: 486 residential parking space and 134 commercial parking spaces.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Lanterra Developments
SM22126 · 13 August 2015 · “11 Wellesley Street West”
Lanterra Developments
SM20477 · 15 May 2014 · “11 Wellesley St. West”
Lanterra Developments
SM19442 · 20 June 2013 · “11 Wellesley Street West”
Lanterra Developments
SM18544 · 15 October 2012 · “25 Wellesley St. W.”
Lanterra Developments
SM18544 · 15 October 2012 · “26 Breadalbane Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13

4 lobbied · 23 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13: 4 lobbied and 23 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	23	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.