Development application · Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
Development application 19 178777 STE 09 PL
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 26 June 2019
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
- Addresses
- 26 Ernest Ave
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Submitted
- 26 June 2019
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 14 169077 STE 18 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Part Lot Control Exemption application for the creation of 79 townhouse lots. A Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium application No. 19 178810 STE 09 CD for vehicular access to the 79 townhouse lots and A Draft Plan of Standard Condominium application No. 19 178830 STE 09 CD for a below-grade parking garage structure will be reviewed concurrently.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Neudorfer Development CorporationSM25266 · 6 November 2017 · “26 Ernest Ave”
- Neudorfer Development CorporationSM25174 · 17 October 2017 · “26 Ernest Ave”
- Montevallo Developments LimitedSM20142 · 3 March 2014 · “26 Ernest Avenue”
- Montevallo Development CorporationSM20143 · 3 March 2014 · “26 Ernest Avenue.”
- Montevallo Developments LimitedSM19636 · 4 September 2013 · “26 Ernest Ave.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.