Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 19 114174 NNY 06 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 11 February 2019
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 50 Wilson Heights Blvd
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Submitted
- 11 February 2019
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- Zoning Bylaw 228-2020 & 1298-2015 (OPA 309) & SASP 387
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Zoning By-law #228-2020 & OPA 309 & SASP 387City-initiated (Housing Now) zoning by-law amendment proposing a transit-oriented, mixed use development at 50 Wilson Heights Blvd. The proposed redevelopment of the commuter parking facility is comprised of the following: 73,864 square metres (791,250 square feet) of residential gross floor area, a portion of which would be dedicated to affordable housing; 623 square metres (6,704 square feet) of indoor and outdoor amenity space; 4,260 square metres (45,859 square feet) of office space; 1,867 square metres (20,096 square feet) of community use; and 672 square metres (7,229 square feet) of retail space. On a block by block basis the proposed mixed-use development consists of: Block 1 would contain a 12 storey commercial and residential building; Block 2 would contain two 16-storey and one 14-storey tall buildings connected by a 6-storey podium building; Block 3 would would contain a 7-storey mid-rise residential building; Block 4 would contain a 2-storey community use with an adjacent community green space; 2 levels of underground parking are proposed; and Park - proposal would also contain a 3,070 square metre (0.76 acre) public park. A draft plan of subdivision application will follow in the near future to create the proposed development blocks, the roads and the public park.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.