Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 18 265043 STE 11 SA
5 Scrivener Sq; 8 Price St; 10 Price St; 10R Price St; 1095 Yonge St; 1097 Yonge St; 1099 Yonge St; 1101 Yonge St; 1103 Yonge St; 1107 Yonge St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 5 December 2018
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 5 Scrivener Sq; 8 Price St; 10 Price St; 10R Price St; 1095 Yonge St; 1097 Yonge St; 1099 Yonge St; 1101 Yonge St; 1103 Yonge St; 1107 Yonge St
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Submitted
- 5 December 2018
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 120 units
- Related file
- 17 168095 STE 27 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan Control application to permit a 21-storey (81.65 metre) mixed-use building with a total of 120 dwelling units, 6,336 square metres of non-residential floor area, and 160 vehicle parking spaces (118 residential spaces and 42 commercial spaces) within a below grade parking garage. Application also includes: on-site parkland dedication; privately owned publicly accessible spaces; reconfiguration of Scrivener Square; and retention of a block of heritage buildings (the Shops of Summerhill).
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- DiamondcorpSM24274 · 27 March 2017 · “10R Price Street”
- DiamondcorpSM24274 · 27 March 2017 · “5 Scrivener Square”
- Whitecastle New Urban Fund 3SM23947 · 23 January 2017 · “10R Price Street”
- Whitecastle New Urban Fund 3SM23947 · 23 January 2017 · “5 Scrivener Square”
- Whitecastle New Urban FundSM23222 · 6 June 2016 · “10R Price Street”
- Whitecastle New Urban FundSM23222 · 6 June 2016 · “5 Scrivener Square”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | 1,629 | 100% (n=12) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.