Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)

Development application 18 250049 STE 27 CD

4 Dundonald St; 5 Gloucester St; 7 Gloucester St; 9 Gloucester St; 11 Gloucester St; 593 Yonge St; 599 Yonge St

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 30 October 2018; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Addresses: 4 Dundonald St; 5 Gloucester St; 7 Gloucester St; 9 Gloucester St; 11 Gloucester St; 593 Yonge St; 599 Yonge St
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 30 October 2018
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 522 units
Related file: 12 235622 STE 27 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Draft Plan of Standard Condominium Approval for the residential component of a 44-storey mixed-use building containing 522 dwelling units, 2 guest suites, with 123 parking spaces in 5 levels of below-grade parking. This application is related to Site Plan Control Application No. 15 248458 STE 27 SA.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Cresford Developments Inc.
SM22918 · 23 March 2016 · “4 Dundonald Street”
Cresford Developments Inc.
SM22918 · 23 March 2016 · “599 Yonge Street”
Cresford Developments Inc.
SM22918 · 23 March 2016 · “9 Gloucester Street”
Cresford Developments Inc.
SM22802 · 16 February 2016 · “4 Dundonald Street”
Cresford Developments Inc.
SM22802 · 16 February 2016 · “599 Yonge Street”
Cresford Developments Inc.
SM22802 · 16 February 2016 · “9 Gloucester Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13

4 lobbied · 23 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13: 4 lobbied and 23 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	23	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.