Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 18 186858 NNY 16 OZ

10 Castlefield Ave; 12 Castlefield Ave; 20 Castlefield Ave; 567 Duplex Ave; 2490-2504 Yonge St; 2500 Yonge St; 2506 Yonge St; 2508 Yonge St; 2510 Yonge St; 2512 Yonge St; 2514 Yonge St

Ward 8 · Mike ColleDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 29 June 2018; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 10 Castlefield Ave; 12 Castlefield Ave; 20 Castlefield Ave; 567 Duplex Ave; 2490-2504 Yonge St; 2500 Yonge St; 2506 Yonge St; 2508 Yonge St; 2510 Yonge St; 2512 Yonge St; 2514 Yonge St
Ward: Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Submitted: 29 June 2018
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 172 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Revised proposal for a 14-storey mixed use building containing 172 dwelling units (17,681 square metres) and retail uses (1,372 square metres) at grade. The proposal includes 3 levels of underground parking containing a total of 184 parking spaces.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Madison Group
SM28001 · 10 April 2019 · “2500 Yonge Street”
Madison Group
SM22120 · 12 August 2015 · “2500 Yonge Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8

33 lobbied · 57 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=2
Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8: 33 lobbied and 57 matched unlobbied applications in 22 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	33	—	100% (n=2)	0%	12%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	57	—	100% (n=3)	0%	27%	0.03

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.