Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Development application 18 156478 NNY 09 SB
- Status
- Draft Plan Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 10 May 2018
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
- Addresses
- 3621 Dufferin St
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Submitted
- 10 May 2018
- Status
- Draft Plan Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- 7 October 2026
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 17 280210 NNY 09 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Plan of subdivision to support new public park and north-south public street required as part of rezoning application (#17-280210 NNY 09 OZ) for a 10-storey mixed-use development incorporating residential units; at grade retail; office; self-storage; outdoor amenity space; and 334 parking spaces and 161 bicycle parking spaces. City Council approved Official Plan Amendment 362. Concurrent Site Plan Application (#16-271500 NNY 09 SA).
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 3621 Dufferin Storage Limited PartnershipSM32165 · 5 August 2021 · “3621 Dufferin Street”
- Canada Lands CompanySM17397 · 2 November 2011 · “3621 Dufferin Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 6
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.