Development application · Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
Development application 18 135656 STE 20 PL
1 Draper St; 6 Spadina Ave; 8 Spadina Ave; 10 Spadina Ave; 12 Spadina Ave; 14 Spadina Ave; 16 Spadina Ave; 18 Spadina Ave; 19 Draper St; 425 Wellington St W; 439 Wellington St W; 440 Front St W; 443 Wellington St W; 444 Front Street West; 450 Front St W; 462 Front St W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 28 March 2018
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
- Addresses
- 1 Draper St; 6 Spadina Ave; 8 Spadina Ave; 10 Spadina Ave; 12 Spadina Ave; 14 Spadina Ave; 16 Spadina Ave; 18 Spadina Ave; 19 Draper St; 425 Wellington St W; 439 Wellington St W; 440 Front St W; 443 Wellington St W; 444 Front Street West; 450 Front St W; 462 Front St W
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 28 March 2018
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 14 116571 STE 20 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Part Lot Control application for lands at 440 Front Street West and various addresses associated with the redevelopment of the former Globe and Mail site ('The Well'). The lands are also subject to a Plan of Subdivision application (file no. 18 135637 STE 20 SB. the purpose of the Plan of Subdivision and Part Lot Control applications is to allow for the consolidation of parcels and the subsequent creation and conveyancing of stratified interest in this mixed-use development. The lands are also subject to an Official Plan amendment and Zoning By-law amendment application (14 116571 STE 20 OZ). Both the OPA and Zoning are in force. There are five site plan control applications currently under review on the lands.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- RioCan Real Estate Investment TrustSM26017 · 7 April 2018 · “19 Draper Street”
- RioCan Real Estate Investment TrustSM26017 · 7 April 2018 · “443 Wellington Street West”
- DiamondcorpSM24223 · 21 March 2017 · “19 Draper Street”
- DiamondcorpSM24223 · 21 March 2017 · “443 Wellington Street West”
- DiamondcorpSM24223 · 21 March 2017 · “462 Front Street West”
- RioCan Real Estate Investment TrustSM19043 · 12 March 2013 · “19 Draper Street”
- Whitecastle New Urban Fund 2SM18940 · 14 February 2013 · “19 Draper St”
- Whitecastle New Urban Fund 2SM18939 · 14 February 2013 · “443 Wellington St. W”
- Whitecastle New Urban Fund 2SM18940 · 14 February 2013 · “443 Wellington St. W”
- Whitecastle New Urban Fund 2SM18939 · 14 February 2013 · “462 Front St W.”
- Whitecastle New Urban Fund 2SM18940 · 14 February 2013 · “462 Front St W.”
- The Woodbridge Company LimitedSM17451 · 14 November 2011 · “19 Draper Street.”
- The Woodbridge Company LimitedSM17440 · 11 November 2011 · “444 Front Street West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.