lobbyTO

Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)

Development application 18 135637 STE 20 SB

1 Draper St; 6 Spadina Ave; 8 Spadina Ave; 10 Spadina Ave; 12 Spadina Ave; 14 Spadina Ave; 16 Spadina Ave; 18 Spadina Ave; 19 Draper St; 425 Wellington St W; 439 Wellington St W; 440 Front St W; 443 Wellington St W; 444 Front Street West; 450 Front St W; 462 Front St W

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
28 March 2018
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Addresses
1 Draper St; 6 Spadina Ave; 8 Spadina Ave; 10 Spadina Ave; 12 Spadina Ave; 14 Spadina Ave; 16 Spadina Ave; 18 Spadina Ave; 19 Draper St; 425 Wellington St W; 439 Wellington St W; 440 Front St W; 443 Wellington St W; 444 Front Street West; 450 Front St W; 462 Front St W
Ward
Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted
28 March 2018
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Related file
14 116571 STE 20 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Plan of Subdivison application for lands at 440 Front Street West and various addresses associated with the redevelopment of the former Globe and Mail site ('The Well'). The purpose of the plan of subdivision is to allow for the consolidation of parcels and the subsequent creation and conveyancing of stratified interest in this mixed-use development. The applicant has also filed a Part Lot control application to allow for the lifting of Part Lot Control provisions (file no. 18 135656 STE 20 PL). The lands are also subject to an Official Plan amendment and Zoning By-law amendment application (14 116571 STE 20 OZ). Both the OPA and Zoning are in force. There are five site plan control applications currently under review on the lands.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 10

1 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide

16 lobbied · 48 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 4 rows
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 10: 1 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied1Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied8Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide: 16 lobbied and 48 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied16Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied48Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.