Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)

Development application 17 276967 ESC 20 CD

Ward 20 · Parthi KandavelDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 18 December 2017; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Addresses: 743 Warden Ave
Ward: Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
Submitted: 18 December 2017
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Related file: 13 268029 ESC 35 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

A Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium application No. 17 276967 ESC 35 CD for vehicular and service access to the 21 townhouse lots on Block 19 (Parts 22, 25, 27 to 29) and Block 25 (Parts 30 to 34). An application for Part Lot Control Exemption to create 21 townhouse lots on Block 19 (Parts 1-21, 23, 24, 26 and 35 to 44) has been submitted and will be reviewed concurrently. This application is related to Site Plan Application No. 13 275737 ESC 35 SA and Draft Plan of Subdivision Application No. 13 268270 ESC 35 SB.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Dymon Storage Corporation
SM32380 · 30 September 2021 · “743 Warden Avenue”
Zahavish Downtown Developments Ltd.
SM30968 · 1 December 2020 · “743 Warden Avenue”
Stafford Development Inc.
SM29119 · 5 November 2019 · “743 Warden Avenue.”
Mattamy Homes Limited
SM25404 · 7 December 2017 · “743 Warden Ave”
The Goldman Group
SM11541 · 14 April 2008 · “743 Warden Avenue”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 2 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.