Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 17 257139 STE 22 OZ

19 Brownlow Ave; 21 Brownlow Ave; 216 Soudan Ave; 218 Soudan Ave; 220 Soudan Ave; 222 Soudan Ave; 224 Soudan Ave; 226 Soudan Ave; 700 Mount Pleasant Rd; 720 Mount Pleasant Rd

Ward 12 · Josh MatlowDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: OMB Approved; Approved
Submitted: 2 November 2017; Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 19 Brownlow Ave; 21 Brownlow Ave; 216 Soudan Ave; 218 Soudan Ave; 220 Soudan Ave; 222 Soudan Ave; 224 Soudan Ave; 226 Soudan Ave; 700 Mount Pleasant Rd; 720 Mount Pleasant Rd
Ward: Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted: 2 November 2017
Status: OMB Approved
Outcome recorded: Approved
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: Yes
Size stated in the description: 204 units; 15,330 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Revised - subsequen to OLT OZ settlement, and Site Plan Application filed which separates lands comprised of 214-226 Soudan Avenue and 19-21 Brownlow Avenuefrom the Briton House Retirement complex (municipally known as 700-730 Mount Pleasant Road) to permit the development of a 21-storey condominium building (71 metres including mechnaical penthouse) with a 4-storey base building, a total residential gross floor area of approximately 15,330.38 square metres, 204 residential units and 65 parking spaces.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12

44 lobbied · 60 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,799

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=9
Matched, unlobbied100% n=9

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied14%
Matched, unlobbied10%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12: 44 lobbied and 60 matched unlobbied applications in 26 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	44	1,925	100% (n=9)	0%	14%	0.02
Matched, unlobbied	60	1,799	100% (n=9)	0%	10%	0.04

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.