Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 17 253844 STE 28 OZ
59 Richmond St E; 114 Church St; 120 Church St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 26 October 2017
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 59 Richmond St E; 114 Church St; 120 Church St
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Submitted
- 26 October 2017
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
An application for Zoning By-law Amendment to allow the construction of a 45-storey mixed-use building (149.5 metres, including mechanical penthouse) at 114 & 120 Church Street and 59 Richmond Street East. The proposal is comprised of varying podium elements ranging in heights from 3 to 10-storeys. Above the podium, the tower reaches a total height of 45-storeys at the corner of Church and Lombard Street with a 12-storey component connected to the north side of the tower along Richmond Street. A 198 square metre on-site park is proposed on the west side of the site fronting Richmond Street East.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Madison GroupSM22117 · 12 August 2015 · “120 Church Street”
- Astral Media Outdoor, L.P.SM14155 · 22 February 2010 · “114 Church Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
83 lobbied · 97 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 83 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 11% | 0.14 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 97 | 1,793 | 93% (n=14) | 7% | 17% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.