lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 17 222387 NNY 15 SA

1-87 Bredonhill Crt; 40 Hooyo Ter; 42 Hooyo Ter; 44 Hooyo Ter; 46 Hooyo Ter; 48 Hooyo Ter; 50 Hooyo Ter; 52 Hooyo Ter; 54 Hooyo Ter; 56 Hooyo Ter; 58 Hooyo Ter; 60 Hooyo Ter; 62 Hooyo Ter; 64 Hooyo Ter; 66 Hooyo Ter; 72 Hooyo Ter; 88 Turtle Island Rd; 92 Turtle Island Rd; 101 Varna Dr; 103 Green Gardens Blvd; 105 Green Gardens Blvd; 107 Green Gardens Blvd; 109 Green Gardens Blvd; 111 Green Gardens Blvd; 113 Green Gardens Blvd; 115 Green Gardens Blvd; 117 Green Gardens Blvd; 119 Green Gardens Blvd; 121 Green Gardens Blvd; 123 Green Gardens Blvd; 125 Green Gardens Blvd; 127 Green Gardens Blvd; 129 Green Gardens Blvd; 131 Green Gardens Blvd; 133 Green Gardens Blvd; 135 Green Gardens Blvd; 137 Green Gardens Blvd; 139 Green Gardens Blvd; 141 Green Gardens Blvd; 145 Green Gardens Blvd

Ward 8 · Mike ColleDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
24 August 2017
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
1-87 Bredonhill Crt; 40 Hooyo Ter; 42 Hooyo Ter; 44 Hooyo Ter; 46 Hooyo Ter; 48 Hooyo Ter; 50 Hooyo Ter; 52 Hooyo Ter; 54 Hooyo Ter; 56 Hooyo Ter; 58 Hooyo Ter; 60 Hooyo Ter; 62 Hooyo Ter; 64 Hooyo Ter; 66 Hooyo Ter; 72 Hooyo Ter; 88 Turtle Island Rd; 92 Turtle Island Rd; 101 Varna Dr; 103 Green Gardens Blvd; 105 Green Gardens Blvd; 107 Green Gardens Blvd; 109 Green Gardens Blvd; 111 Green Gardens Blvd; 113 Green Gardens Blvd; 115 Green Gardens Blvd; 117 Green Gardens Blvd; 119 Green Gardens Blvd; 121 Green Gardens Blvd; 123 Green Gardens Blvd; 125 Green Gardens Blvd; 127 Green Gardens Blvd; 129 Green Gardens Blvd; 131 Green Gardens Blvd; 133 Green Gardens Blvd; 135 Green Gardens Blvd; 137 Green Gardens Blvd; 139 Green Gardens Blvd; 141 Green Gardens Blvd; 145 Green Gardens Blvd
Ward
Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Submitted
24 August 2017
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
110 units
Related file
10 140382 NNY 15 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Application proposes the development of a low rise building block consisting of 9 buildngs with 110 units; 56 of the units are TCHC rental replacement units, the remaining 54 are market units. Parking is proposed via a combination of onsite individual attached garages and offsite in the underground parking for the phase 1B building. This is the 3rd sub-phase of phase 1 of the Lawrence Heights revitalization. Related files: 17 112623SB; 10 140382 OZ and 10 170538 SB

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8

25 lobbied · 70 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=3
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=4

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied8%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=61
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8: 25 lobbied and 70 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied25—100% (n=3)0%8%0.00
Matched, unlobbied70727100% (n=4)0%4%0.00
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=61)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,23772797% (n=96)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.