Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 17 209538 NNY 34 OZ

1 Case Ootes Dr; 3 Case Ootes Dr; 5 Case Ootes Dr; 5 Spruce Pines Cres; 6 Spruce Pines Cres; 7 Case Ootes Dr; 7 Spruce Pines Cres; 8 Spruce Pines Cres; 9 Case Ootes Dr; 9 Spruce Pines Cres; 10 Spruce Pines Cres; 11 Case Ootes Dr; 11 Spruce Pines Cres; 12 Spruce Pines Cres; 13 Case Ootes Dr; 15 Case Ootes Dr; 15 Spruce Pines Cres; 19 Case Ootes Dr; 21 Case Ootes Dr; 23 Case Ootes Dr; 25 Case Ootes Dr; 26 Case Ootes Dr; 26 Spruce Pines Cres; 27 Case Ootes Dr; 27 Spruce Pines Cres; 28 Case Ootes Dr; 28 Spruce Pines Cres; 29 Case Ootes Dr; 29 Spruce Pines Cres; 30 Case Ootes Dr; 30 Spruce Pines Cres; 31 Case Ootes Dr; 31 Spruce Pines Cres; 32 Case Ootes Dr; 32 Spruce Pines Cres; 33 Case Ootes Dr; 33 Spruce Pines Cres; 34 Case Ootes Dr; 35 Case Ootes Dr; 36 Case Ootes Dr; 37 Case Ootes Dr; 38 Case Ootes Dr; 40 Case Ootes Dr; 41 Case Ootes Dr; 42 Case Ootes Dr; 43 Case Ootes Dr; 44 Case Ootes Dr; 45 Case Ootes Dr; 46 Case Ootes Dr; 47 Case Ootes Dr; 48 Case Ootes Dr; 62 Tisdale Ave; 64A Tisdale Ave; 64B Tisdale Ave; 66 Tisdale Ave; 68A Tisdale Ave; 68B Tisdale Ave; 70A Tisdale Ave; 70B Tisdale Ave; 72A Tisdale Ave; 72B Tisdale Ave; 74A Tisdale Ave; 74B Tisdale Ave; 76A Tisdale Ave; 76B Tisdale Ave; 78 Tisdale Ave; 80A Tisdale Ave; 80B Tisdale Ave; 82A Tisdale Ave; 82B Tisdale Ave; 84A Tisdale Ave; 84B Tisdale Ave; 86A Tisdale Ave; 86B Tisdale Ave; 88A Tisdale Ave; 88B Tisdale Ave; 90 Bartley Dr; 90 Tisdale Ave; 92 Bartley Dr; 94 Bartley Dr; 96 Bartley Dr; 98 Bartley Dr; 100 Bartley Dr; 102 Bartley Dr; 104-110 Bartley Dr

Ward 16 · Jon BurnsideDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 1 August 2017; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 1 Case Ootes Dr; 3 Case Ootes Dr; 5 Case Ootes Dr; 5 Spruce Pines Cres; 6 Spruce Pines Cres; 7 Case Ootes Dr; 7 Spruce Pines Cres; 8 Spruce Pines Cres; 9 Case Ootes Dr; 9 Spruce Pines Cres; 10 Spruce Pines Cres; 11 Case Ootes Dr; 11 Spruce Pines Cres; 12 Spruce Pines Cres; 13 Case Ootes Dr; 15 Case Ootes Dr; 15 Spruce Pines Cres; 19 Case Ootes Dr; 21 Case Ootes Dr; 23 Case Ootes Dr; 25 Case Ootes Dr; 26 Case Ootes Dr; 26 Spruce Pines Cres; 27 Case Ootes Dr; 27 Spruce Pines Cres; 28 Case Ootes Dr; 28 Spruce Pines Cres; 29 Case Ootes Dr; 29 Spruce Pines Cres; 30 Case Ootes Dr; 30 Spruce Pines Cres; 31 Case Ootes Dr; 31 Spruce Pines Cres; 32 Case Ootes Dr; 32 Spruce Pines Cres; 33 Case Ootes Dr; 33 Spruce Pines Cres; 34 Case Ootes Dr; 35 Case Ootes Dr; 36 Case Ootes Dr; 37 Case Ootes Dr; 38 Case Ootes Dr; 40 Case Ootes Dr; 41 Case Ootes Dr; 42 Case Ootes Dr; 43 Case Ootes Dr; 44 Case Ootes Dr; 45 Case Ootes Dr; 46 Case Ootes Dr; 47 Case Ootes Dr; 48 Case Ootes Dr; 62 Tisdale Ave; 64A Tisdale Ave; 64B Tisdale Ave; 66 Tisdale Ave; 68A Tisdale Ave; 68B Tisdale Ave; 70A Tisdale Ave; 70B Tisdale Ave; 72A Tisdale Ave; 72B Tisdale Ave; 74A Tisdale Ave; 74B Tisdale Ave; 76A Tisdale Ave; 76B Tisdale Ave; 78 Tisdale Ave; 80A Tisdale Ave; 80B Tisdale Ave; 82A Tisdale Ave; 82B Tisdale Ave; 84A Tisdale Ave; 84B Tisdale Ave; 86A Tisdale Ave; 86B Tisdale Ave; 88A Tisdale Ave; 88B Tisdale Ave; 90 Bartley Dr; 90 Tisdale Ave; 92 Bartley Dr; 94 Bartley Dr; 96 Bartley Dr; 98 Bartley Dr; 100 Bartley Dr; 102 Bartley Dr; 104-110 Bartley Dr
Ward: Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
Submitted: 1 August 2017
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 17 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Proposed development of 84 townhouses, including 67 freehold and 17 condominium units. The proposal also includes land conveyances for a public road and a public park.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Nascent Developments Inc.
SM31417 · 16 March 2021 · “78 Tisdale Avenue”
Nascent Developments Inc.
SM23800 · 7 December 2016 · “78 Tisdale Avenue”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16

4 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16: 4 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	8	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.