Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 17 118464 STE 28 SA

46 Power St; 48 Power St; 50 Power St; 52 Power St; 54 Power St; 113 Parliament St; 115 Parliament St; 121 Parliament St; 123 Parliament St; 125 Parliament St; 129 Parliament St; 135 Parliament St

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 17 February 2017; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 46 Power St; 48 Power St; 50 Power St; 52 Power St; 54 Power St; 113 Parliament St; 115 Parliament St; 121 Parliament St; 123 Parliament St; 125 Parliament St; 129 Parliament St; 135 Parliament St
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 17 February 2017
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 520 units
Related file: 13 181685 STE 28 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Approval to construct a 19 and 22-storey mixed-use building consisting of a 5-storey podium and 2 towers, with retail uses on the first 2 storeys (4,072 sq. m NGFA) and resiential uses above (39,177 sq. m. RGFA). 520 dwelling units, 249 parking spaces. 15 existing rental units are proposed to be replaced within the new building.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Great Gulf Group of Companies
SM23378 · 21 July 2016 · “48 Power Street”
Great Gulf Group of Companies
SM18904 · 1 February 2013 · “48 Power Street”
Great Gulf Homes
SM18576 · 19 October 2012 · “48 Power Street”
Great Gulf Ltd.
SM18552 · 17 October 2012 · “48 Power Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13

56 lobbied · 128 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied7%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13: 56 lobbied and 128 matched unlobbied applications in 32 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	56	—	100% (n=5)	0%	7%	0.16
Matched, unlobbied	128	—	100% (n=7)	0%	2%	0.01

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.