Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Development application 17 102917 NNY 15 SB
40 Playfair Ave; 901 Lawrence Ave W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 10 January 2017
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
- Addresses
- 40 Playfair Ave; 901 Lawrence Ave W
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Submitted
- 10 January 2017
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 17 102913 NNY 15 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
The application for draft plan of subdivision proposes to create two lots from the total land holding known as the Villa Columbo Campus lands. One of the lots in th northwest corner of the site will accommodate a four-storey, mixed-use building consisting of a community centre and secondary school (Torontio Catholic District School Board). The proposed building will replace the existing Columbus Centre and Dante Alighieri Academy Secondary School, which is currently located south of this site. the applciant has also applied for a zoning by-law amendment to permt the proposed use (file no. 17 102913 NNY 15 OZ). Associated Site Plan Control files that have been submitted include file no. 16 245637 NNY 15 SA (joint-use facility) and file no. 16 245643 NNY 15 SA (reconfigured existing parking areas).
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.