Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 16 272056 ESC 40 CD
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 30 December 2016
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 1251 Bridletowne Crcl
- Ward
- Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
- Submitted
- 30 December 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 168 units
- Related file
- 12 266748 ESC 40 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
This application for standard condomimium is to register 168 residential dwelling units. Please see associated applications for common elements condominium (file number 17 101126 ESC 40 CD) and for lifting of Part Lot Control (file number 17 101131 ESC 40 PL). A related consent application has also been submitted (file number 16 272000 ESC 40 CO, B0072/16SC).
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Genesis HomesSM23665 · 31 October 2016 · “1251 Bridletowne Circle.”
- Waltman Building Group Inc.SM23575 · 29 September 2016 · “1251 Bridletowne Circle”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.