Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 16 272001 NNY 23 OZ
305 Poyntz Ave; 306 Poyntz Ave; 307 Poyntz Ave; 308 Poyntz Ave; 314 Bogert Ave; 315 Bogert Ave; 316 Bogert Ave; 317 Bogert Ave; 325 Bogert Ave
- Status
- OMB Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 30 December 2016
- Appealed
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 305 Poyntz Ave; 306 Poyntz Ave; 307 Poyntz Ave; 308 Poyntz Ave; 314 Bogert Ave; 315 Bogert Ave; 316 Bogert Ave; 317 Bogert Ave; 325 Bogert Ave
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Submitted
- 30 December 2016
- Status
- OMB Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
- Size stated in the description
- 148 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Redevelopment of site with 6 new residential towers (21-27 storeys), 8-10 storey podiums with street related commercial on Sheppard Avenue West, extension of Bogert Avenue and a public park. Proposed demolition of seven of ten existing rental blocks and 8 detached dwellings. Proposed retention of 148 rental units and 269 rental replacement units. A 3-storey addition is proposed above the retained rental building. Two 20 unit stacked townhouse buildings are proposed on the two blocks that are currently detached dwellings. 1,840 parking spaces are proposed, with 80 surface and 1,760 below grade.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Greatwise DevelopmentsSM29717 · 4 February 2020 · “325 Bogert Avenue”
- Greatwise DevelopmentsSM29718 · 4 February 2020 · “325 Bogert Avenue”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
37 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 24% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 64% (n=5) | 36% | 16% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.