Development application · Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
Development application 16 269178 NNY 26 PL
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 20 December 2016
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
- Addresses
- 939 Eglinton Ave E
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Submitted
- 20 December 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 15 141830 NNY 26 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
An application for Part Lot Control Exemption to permit the creation of 3 parcels. The property is subject to an application for Zoning By-law Amendment (File No. 13 107003 NNT 26 OZ).
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Camrost-FelcorpSM27655 · 15 February 2019 · “939 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Upper Eastside Building Group Inc.SM26550 · 24 July 2018 · “939 Eglinton Avenue East”
- DiamondcorpSM24267 · 26 March 2017 · “939 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Whitecastle New Urban Fund 2SM22499 · 17 November 2015 · “939 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Whitecastle New Urban Fund 2SM18293 · 25 July 2012 · “939 Eglinton Avenue East”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.