Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 16 269114 STE 28 SA
1 Yonge St; 7 Yonge St; 28 Freeland St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 20 December 2016
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 1 Yonge St; 7 Yonge St; 28 Freeland St
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 20 December 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 60,743 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 13 129256 STE 10 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Phase 1 of the proposed 5-phased development (north and south parcel) at 1-7 Yonge Street. This is a 65-storey, 204.2 metre high, mixed-use building with a total GFA of 60,743 square metres (including a 4,772 square metre Community Centre on floors 1 and 2, 1,167 square metres of retail at grade and 54,804 square metres of residential/affordable housing on floors 1 to 65).
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Pinnacle InternationalSM34316 · 27 March 2023 · “1 Yonge St”
- Pinnacle International (Seven Yonge) Ltd.SM26905 · 26 October 2018 · “7 Yonge Street”
- Pinnacle InternationalSM26093 · 20 April 2018 · “7 Yonge Street”
- Mondiale Development LTD.SM18725 · 5 December 2012 · “1 Yonge Street”
- Pinnacle Internation GroupSM18743 · 3 December 2012 · “1 Yonge Street”
- Pinnacle InternationalSM18737 · 30 November 2012 · “1 Yonge Street”
- Pinnacle InternationalSM18712 · 23 November 2012 · “1 Yonge Street”
- Osmington Inc.SM17882 · 8 March 2012 · “1 Yonge Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.