Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 16 264686 ESC 35 SA
- Status
- NOAC Issued
- Approved
- Submitted
- 15 December 2016
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 3359 Danforth Ave
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 15 December 2016
- Status
- NOAC Issued
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 26 units; 2,199 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposed redevelopment of a former KFC restaurant site with a new 7-storey mixed use building containing 19 residential units (GFA of 2,199 m2) and commercial space on the ground floor (93 m2). A total of 18 parking spaces are proposed at-grade, of which 6 spaces will be accessed via parking. stackers. NOAC issued April 21, 2020 but Statement of Approval not yet achieved.. NOAC extended Feb 2, 2023 for two more years. On October 8, 2024 applicant has come in with a revised proposal under the same application. The contemplated development is 6 storeys and 26 units, and is consistent with the setbacks required by the Zoning by-law with an increase in setback to 13.48 metres from the south lot line abutting the existing residential property. The building floor plate has reduced to an average of 376.35 square meters and thus the overall gross floor area to 1996.34 square metres and a reduction in floor space index to 2.45. Additionally, the number of units has increased to 26 and with the introduction of studio apartments along with 1 bed, 2 bed and 3 bed typologies. The average size of units is 63.75square meters. The commercial area is located at grade with an area of 65.62 square metres and has been repositioned towards Danforth Road ¿ Byng Avenue intersection giving it additional frontage. The onsite stacked parking is removed, thus reducing one parking space. The bike parking spaces have been increased to 33 long-term spaces in the basement and 7 short-term at grade.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 20
11 lobbied · 34 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 34 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.