Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 16 242424 WET 05 OZ

196 North Queen St; 300 North Queen St; 310 North Queen St; 320 North Queen St; 1750 The Queensway; 1790 The Queensway; 1830 The Queensway; 1900 The Queensway

Ward 3 · Amber MorleyDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: OMB Approved; Approved
Submitted: 25 October 2016; Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 196 North Queen St; 300 North Queen St; 310 North Queen St; 320 North Queen St; 1750 The Queensway; 1790 The Queensway; 1830 The Queensway; 1900 The Queensway
Ward: Ward 3 · Amber Morley
Submitted: 25 October 2016
Status: OMB Approved
Outcome recorded: Approved
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: Yes
Size stated in the description: 2,135 units
Related file: 13 247159 WET 05 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Amendment to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permt 8 buildings ranging in heights between 6 storeys and 38 storeys with a combined total 2135 units, of which 200 units are affordable rental housing; a miinimum of 15% of the units are 2 bedroom and a minimum of 10% of the units are 3 bedroom units. Parkland dedication, POPS and a city owned childcare facility are components of this application.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3

37 lobbied · 72 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=2
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied15%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3: 37 lobbied and 72 matched unlobbied applications in 25 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	37	—	100% (n=2)	0%	19%	0.27
Matched, unlobbied	72	—	100% (n=6)	0%	15%	0.04

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.