Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 16 224007 STE 28 CD
1 York St; 90 Harbour Street; 100 Harbour St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 16 September 2016
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 1 York St; 90 Harbour Street; 100 Harbour St
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 16 September 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 678 units
- Related file
- 11 295626 STE 28 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Draft Plan of Condominium application for newly constructed mixed-use building: 678 dwelling units, 187 parking spaces
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Menkes Developments LtdSM26306 · 9 May 2018 · “1 York Street”
- Sun Life FinancialSM24713 · 15 June 2017 · “1 York Street”
- Sun Life FinancialSM24066 · 7 March 2017 · “1 York Street”
- Menkes Developments LtdSM17274 · 5 October 2011 · “90 Harbour Street”
- MenkesSM15507 · 6 December 2010 · “90 Harbour Street”
- Torgan GroupSM11679 · 6 May 2008 · “90 Harbour Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.