Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 16 118542 NNY 23 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 19 February 2016
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 4800 Yonge St
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Submitted
- 19 February 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 536 units
- Related file
- 15 250774 NNY 23 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposal to amend the North York Zoning By-law 7625 regarding land use, density and height permissions. Currently the site is zoned for 100% commercial use, 4.5x FSI and 23 storeys under By-law 30687. The proposal is for 23% commercial. 12x FSI and 160 m height demonstrated by a 49 storey mixed use building 37,411.42 square metres of residential floor area with 536 dwelling units and 5 storeys of commercial at floors 1 through 5; and 6 storeys of below grade parking. This ZBA follows the OPA (File 15 250774).
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Menkes Developments LtdSM37229 · 10 December 2025 · “4800 Yonge Street.”
- Menkes Developments LtdSM27800 · 6 March 2019 · “4800 Yonge Street”
- Menkes Developments LtdSM25231 · 30 October 2017 · “4800 Yonge Street”
- Oxford Properties GroupSM18105 · 14 May 2012 · “4800 Yonge Street”
- Oxford Properties GroupSM18109 · 14 May 2012 · “4800 Yonge St.”
- Oxford Properties GroupSM18115 · 14 May 2012 · “4800 Yonge St.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
38 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 38 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 21% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.