Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 16 118020 NNY 09 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 18 February 2016
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1629 Sheppard Ave W
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Submitted
- 18 February 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 7 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
1) PREVIOUS PROPOSAL: Construct 4 sets of semi-detached houses (8 in total) fronting Sheppard Ave W - vehicular parking at the rear with access from a driveway from New Seeley Drive..PLEASE NOTE PLANS STAMPED RECEIVED OCTOBER 26, 2017. Note applicants covering letter and REVISED REPORTS. MOVE TO FINALIZE.2) APRIL 22, 2020 PROPOSAL: Construct 3 sets of semi-detached houses and 1 detached house (total 4 houses with total 7 dwelling units) fronting onto Sheppard Avenue West, with vehicular access via a driveway from Sheppard Avenue West. Received April 22, 2020.3) JULY 10, 2020:Toronto Building only circulation4) FEBRUARY 26, 2021: Revised proposal for 3 sets of semi-detached houses and 1 detached house (total 4 houses with total 7 dwelling units) fronting onto Sheppard Avenue West, with vehicular access via a driveway from Sheppard Avenue West. Includes a proposed new multi-use trail in front.5) June 9, 2021 - Toronto Building circulation - Revised draft amending By-laws 569-2013 and 76256) December 3, 2021: Revised proposal for 3 sets of semi-detached houses and 1 detached house (total 4 houses with total 7 dwelling units) fronting onto Sheppard Avenue West, with vehicular access via a driveway from Sheppard Avenue West. Received December 3, 2021.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.