Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 16 111311 STE 27 OZ

295 George St; 297 George St; 299 George St; 301 George St; 301A George St; 303 George St; 305 George St; 309 George St; 311 George St; 315 George St; 339 George St; 349 George St

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 1 February 2016; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 295 George St; 297 George St; 299 George St; 301 George St; 301A George St; 303 George St; 305 George St; 309 George St; 311 George St; 315 George St; 339 George St; 349 George St
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 1 February 2016
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 21 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Proposal for an Offical Plan and Rezoning Amendment to permit a 9 storey institutional building that will provide 378 bed long-term care, 130 bed transitional assisted living, 100 bed emergency shelter, and 21 units of affordable housing along with a 4,000 sq m community service hub

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13

83 lobbied · 97 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=10
Matched, unlobbied93% n=14

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied7%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied17%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13: 83 lobbied and 97 matched unlobbied applications in 34 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	83	—	100% (n=10)	0%	11%	0.14
Matched, unlobbied	97	1,793	93% (n=14)	7%	17%	0.08

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.