Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 15 269073 ESC 36 SA
168 Clonmore Dr; 170 Clonmore Dr; 172 Clonmore Dr; 174 Clonmore Dr; 176 Clonmore Dr; 178 Clonmore Dr; 180 Clonmore Dr; 182 Clonmore Dr; 184 Clonmore Dr
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 24 December 2015
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 168 Clonmore Dr; 170 Clonmore Dr; 172 Clonmore Dr; 174 Clonmore Dr; 176 Clonmore Dr; 178 Clonmore Dr; 180 Clonmore Dr; 182 Clonmore Dr; 184 Clonmore Dr
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 24 December 2015
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 121 units
- Related file
- 15 106475 ESC 36 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan Control Application to permit the development of 121 stacked townhouse units within seven (7) buildings. Two of the seven buildings are parallel to Clonmore Dr, the remainder are internal to the site. Building heights are 13.5m. The total gross floor area proposed is 11,943.4 sq. m. A total of 168 parking spaces are proposed, including 143 spaces for residents, including 6 barrier free spaces, and 23 spaces for visitors, including 1 barrier free space. Most parking spaces are located within an underground parking garage, with the exception of 2 of the visitor spaces which are proposed at grade. A total of 114 bicycle parking spaces are proposed (80 for residents within the underground garage, and 24 surface visitor spaces). Access to the interior of the site and the underground parking is provided via a private driveway from Clonmore Drive located opposite Queensbury Avenue. The site is 1 hectare (2.46 acres) in size and backs onto the Metrolinx/GO rail corridor. Related OPA and Rezoning file 15 106475 ESC 36 OZ.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Leaside Residences I LPSM33247 · 18 May 2022 · “168 Clonmore Dr”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 20
11 lobbied · 34 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 34 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.