Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 15 214418 STE 30 SA
897 Queen St E; 899 Queen St E
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 28 August 2015
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 897 Queen St E; 899 Queen St E
- Ward
- Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
- Submitted
- 28 August 2015
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 59 units; 5,239 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 15 214416 STE 30 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
The Applicant, Daniels Leslieville Corporation, has submitted a revised Site Plan (File #15 214418 STE 30 SA) application, which follows City Council approval on October 5, 2016 of the associated rezoning (File # 15 214416 STE 30 OZ) application (see by-laws 975-2016 and 976-2016). The application is being submitted to permit the development of a 6 storey mixed-use building, with a maximum height of 20 metres (23.5 metres to the roof of the mechanical penthouse) and a maximum FSI of 3.8. The proposed building will maintain at grade retail fronting Queen Street East, three grade-related residential units fronting onto the public laneway to the south and 5 storeys of residential units above. In total, 59 residential units are proposed, with a gross floor area of approximately 5,239.2 square meters and 320.7 square metres of retail space at grade. The proposal includes 37 parking spaces in one level of below-grade parking, including 4 visitor parking spaces, with access from the public laneway. The proposal also includes 97 resident and visitor bicycle parking spaces located at-grade and in the below-grade parking level.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 14
17 lobbied · 35 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 35 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.